《棋王》(阿城)描述人在文革時期所處的困境中如何在棋盤上找到精神上的完全自由及自主世界,而數學則讓人一瞥一個完美的精神世界。
27 December 2015
12 December 2015
science
To share the discussion with my brother.
[12/12 9:21 am] Philip Tang:
for 2000 years there have been interesting pursuits. in the end, not talking about moral stuff, its science that prevails. when i say science i mean the global scientific community, not a few scientists.
moral issues aside, i am glad that science has laid a solid foundation in human civilisation.
as i discussed things with portia and bryan, i always led them to science, logic, reality etc. reality is also important, lest we will be armchair theorizing.
facts are important, i.e. reality. what chains the facts together in meaningful ways is knowledge and theory. theory can predict what comes next. facts alone are bare facts.
there are all sorts of theories, scientific theory, conspiracy theory, yin and yang etc.
what you believe very much shapes your character, present and future.
07 December 2015
05 December 2015
28 November 2015
A hymn
Man is lonely by birth.
Man is only a pilgrim on earth.
Born to be king, time is but a temporary thing,
only on loan while on earth.
Like the wind in the tree,
man has been rather reckless and free.
Thrown far and wide, we long to settle down beside
the stream flowing through eternity.
Like the grass on the lawn,
we will pass by the way and be gone.
A lesson to learn, we walk but once there's no return.
Time is always moving on.
Man is longing for One,
for a song and a place in the sun,
a home up above where ev'ry day is lived in love, for
rest when the journey is done.
12 November 2015
强積金
强積金 : 問題不是不同年齡需要有不同的投資策略,平時我們可以這樣講。但对强積金而言,那是基本的退休保障,應該以保守的投資計算,因為輸不起。進取型的投資應該應用於閒資 (spare money),而不是强積金。
强積金多年來的低回報是另一個問題,不能混為一談。因為即使採用進取型,亦不表示必然賺錢,反而風險增加了而可能得不償失,屆時便退休無望了。
司法覆核
香港很奇怪,有一個玩具是有錢人不敢玩,玩不起,因為可以輸身家,但窮人卻可以免費玩,那就是司法覆核,全是納稅人付鈔,不單是律師費,還有延後的數以億計的社會成本。本來通過法律援助進行司法覆核旨在公平地伸張正義,但平衡點似乎過了頭。不知海外的法援是否這樣的?
01 November 2015
中美博弈
30 August 2015
貨幣戰
現代戰爭不用流血。以本傷人的商業策略,與古時戰爭無異,近期貨幣戰亦然。幾年前美國實施量化寬鬆,溝淡所有持有美元貨幣的人(包括窮人)及其他國家的財富,以致美國獨大,繼續以不負責任的行為搶掠,以借貸維持其享樂,以量化寬鬆來減債,繼而以武力威嚇。如今中國實施人民幣貶值及減息,其殺傷力影響所及,美國可能需要延遲加息以致延遲其回歸經濟正常軌道,所種下的惡性投資可能越滾越大,不感想像。
05 August 2015
11 July 2015
Greece
Tsipras is a genius politician. First he won the election, then the referendum, and finally the votes of the opposition in parliament. Now he has "united" the sentiments of the greek population. And Europe happens to be still so romantic about people power. Not only has Tsipras won Greece but also the leftist sentiment of Europe. Having said that the latest proposal submitted by him is an indication of pragmatism after all. By this weekend we will all know what is real politics or realpolitik, and Tsipras will make his mark in history one way or another.
28 June 2015
希臘
一個先使未來錢又拖欠還錢的西方民主國家,其領導人將會帶領國家走向衰敗,以為可以爭取保持高福利政策最後或許變成弄巧反拙,主要原因就是甚麼都"去到盡",幾十年來不顧後果(子孫)推行高福利政策,談判時又採取去到盡冇彎轉只談尊嚴不顧現實的策略,最終只會因為自私及/或自以為是而失販。
16 May 2015
12 May 2015
07 May 2015
pension
i was thinking if some people don't like means test because of its stigma, in the case of old aged pension, can we simply dish out the pension for everyone aged 65 or above, and then for those who have to file a tax return, at their senior age, there will be a separate section where they have to put in the amount of pension received and if their net income, apart from the pension amount, has reached a certain level then in ascending scale the whole amount of the pension will become tax. this will do away with the stigma issue, and somehow will minimise all hassles and administrative work. if we go along that line, only two questions remain: (1) the pension amount, and (2) the level of net income in a tax return that serves as the ultimate means test.
30 April 2015
energy revolution
The Western world has gone through industrial revolution (capitalisation), democratisation, information revolution (computerisation), but economic growth has been unsustainable in recent years. Unless there is any success in the energy revolution (shale gas), the US economy will probably continue to suffer in the face of the rise of China and the economic growth in other countries associated with China.
從馬克思理論看,剝削的大本營東移了。
22 April 2015
21 April 2015
20 April 2015
19 April 2015
中國的發展道路
中國的發展道路是這樣的 :
公路網、石油、天然氣
工廠、汽車
互聯網、服務行業
環保、再生能源、電動汽車
航天技術
加强鐵路網
研製大飛機、加建機場、開放空域
保衛航海路線
深化互聯網作商貿及創新協作平台 …
爭取民主,不進則退
以前爭取民主是指向港府、英國政府… 回歸後則指向特區政府及中央。若政改不獲通過,將會有一個很弔詭的情況,那就是,難道指向一半香港市民?民主路上不進則退,可悲。這個豪賭赢面甚低。若社會上出現大混亂,難道要中央介入?這不是特區政府將來的管治問題,而是與每一位香港市民息息相關的,包括經濟發展、民生等千萬個問題。看鄰近國家及地區已不停地抛離香港,何謂萬劫不復?這是一個唯心、理想的問題?還是一個唯物、實際的問題?不進則退,不知等待何時。
03 April 2015
西方與新加坡
其實這與新加坡不許吃香口膠沒有分別。
2015-04-03 HKT 21:19
法國國會下議院通過,禁止骨瘦如柴的人士,擔任模特兒,聘請被稱為「骨模」的過瘦模特兒的經理人公司或品牌,可能目臨最高7萬5千歐元的罰款及監禁6個月。法國全國模特兒經理人公司聯會批評,新法例會影響法國模特兒業的競爭力。
法新新通過的法例訂明,身高體重指數低於某一標準的人,不能當模特兒行天橋。衞生部長認為,年輕模特兒應該好好照顧自己健康。
《中华人民共和国和乌克兰友好合作条约》
《中华人民共和国和乌克兰友好合作条约》
标签:军事
乌克兰目前已经陷入内忧外患的局面,外部俄罗斯军事政治打压内部经济遭遇寒冬,此时的乌克兰该走向何处?中国是可以施以援手的,比如调停乌克兰与俄罗斯之间的冲突关系,俄罗斯现在有求于中国,这个面子普京还是会给的。那么乌克兰拿什么利益与北京交换呢?毫无疑问,中国或许将全面接盘乌克兰的军事技术遗产。
乌克兰过去是配套苏联的国防工业体系的,现在乌克兰的很多军工技术就是俄罗斯也没有,普京已经眼馋很久了。
2月28日,新华社播发的一条消息,引起舆论场的注意。在日前召开的第十二届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议上,作出一项决定:批准2013年12月5日由中国领导人与时任乌克兰总统的亚努科维奇在北京签署的《中华人民共和国和乌克兰友好合作条约》。
虽然全国人大通过了这个条约,但舆论场有一种说法,亚努科维奇与中国签订这份“友好条约”回国三天后,就被反对派举行的“广场革命”推翻。
最近在乌东战场的冲突中,乌军方连连失守,况且乌克兰经济即将走向崩溃,乌克兰政府面临着前所未的困境,中国人大此时批准中乌“友好条约”,乌方是否承认并予以执行,还很难说得清楚。
但这个条约是中国和乌克兰的正式文件,根据维也纳公约法,这种正式的联合声明有条约的效力。这并不是一些人所说是中国和亚努科维奇签订的条约。
中国所保障的是乌克兰这个国家,而不是亚努科维奇这个政权。因此只要乌克兰国家还存在,这个条约就有效,双方就有义务遵守这个协议。
尽管如此,中国人大在现在这个节骨眼上批准这个条约,不免让人生疑。是形势的需要,还是有其它目的?
此前的中乌合作,出于欧美与俄罗斯的因素,可以说乌方是有所保留的。也就是说在某种程度上是中国有求于乌克兰。
而在危机的情况之下,为了缓解经济压力,恐怕乌克兰更大程度上的将有求于中国,如果想得到中国的支持与帮助,就必须加大与中国的合作力度。
更重要的是,乌克兰危机,有可能使俄罗斯与欧美的战略对抗升级,这必然的要缓解中国的战略压力。中国虽然会保持中立,但一定会给俄罗斯某种程度的支持。
因为有俄罗斯在,中国并不太担心欧洲的东扩计划,乌克兰危机在战略上对中国没有不利的影响,或者说不会给中国带来战略压力。
当然,中国能否在乌克兰危机中分得一杯羹,现在下结论还为时过早。但中国将对乌克兰采取的是务实主义态度,如果乌政府可以继续保持与中国的合作关系,确保中国在乌重要的经济和军事关系的利益份额,中国将会与乌方发展新的关系。
可以说,现在的乌克兰危机对中国有利。无论乌克兰最终成为欧盟、美国还是俄罗斯的友邦,都将致力于深化与中国的政经和军事合作。
观察人士为此作出的分析认为,中国实际上在为下一步介入解决乌克兰问题增加的筹码。如果乌方决定执行双方的“友好条约”,这可能意味着,中国将在未来的谈判中发挥积极作用。
客观的说,中国承担这类外交使命的经验不多,不过,在此问题上中国无疑比其他国家更有优势。首先,中国与俄罗斯 ... ...
11 February 2015
西九
西九支出龐大,但收入 ...
沒有地產項目(當年被迫取消了) ...
所謂本土文化的收入又有幾多? ...
所謂本土文化又如何長期吸引外來遊客或藝術發燒友來欣賞呢? ...
香港人何時才清醒呢?
07 February 2015
doctrine of necessity
Seriously, can the doctrine of necessity be applied in LegCo to resolve the impasse arising from filibustering?
"The Doctrine of Necessity is the basis on which extra-legal actions by state actors, which are designed to restore order, are found to be constitutional. The maxim on which the doctrine is based originated in the writings of the medieval jurist Henry de Bracton, and similar justifications for this kind of extra-legal action have been advanced by more recent legal authorities, including William Blackstone.
In modern times, the doctrine was first used in a controversial 1954 judgment in which Pakistani Chief Justice Muhammad Munir validated the extra-constitutional use of emergency powers by Governor General, Ghulam Mohammad.[1] In his judgment, the Chief Justice cited Bracton's maxim, 'that which is otherwise not lawful is made lawful by necessity', thereby providing the label that would come to be attached to the judgment and the doctrine that it was establishing.
The Doctrine of Necessity has since been applied in a number of Commonwealth countries, and in 2010 was invoked to justify extra-legal actions in Nigeria."
04 January 2015
Discussion on Democracy
29 December 2014 : 答應了 Portia Nora 與 Bryan Tang 討論民主,今天晚上吃過飯後 bryan 負責寫 bullet points 及劃 flow charts, 而 portia 則用 laptop 繼續寫她的論述。 bryan 寫了5張A4 紙,很有意思。 we started from occupy central versus anti-protest, then moved on to a comparative study of the westminster system, supremacy of the parliament, house of commons, house of lords, to the US system including congress, senate and the electoral college, and onto the bicameral legislature and the 2012 election committee in HK, followed by the 2017 proposal regarding the nominating committee and the counter arguments including the proposal for civil nomination, and then we talked about the basic law, national security present and past, and the failures and success if any of the occupy central and in particular its strategies vis a vis the local backlash and lack of support from mainlanders, the views of the judiciary, the waning interest from the media and governments around the world at the later stage, etc. (also democracy vs. meritocracy, etc.)